TOPIC: In depth feedback, as requested by in game GMs

Davoruk wrote: If we are offering suggestions then I do not see why we could not open up and allow two of any given class in a party. We already essentially do with Fighter and Wizard and I have never seen it create a balance issue.

While allowing two of any given class would not eliminate all class selection problems it would cover a very large percentage.

It is an interesting suggestion but there are some issues (which can likely be worked around, just pointing them out). The party card only has one row for each class. There is only one slider for each class. How do you match the slider or the player against their entry on the party card if there were duplicate classes there?

For Rogue, who gets to attempt the box first, and does each Rogue get to attempt each box or just one of them?

While I would love to see 10 Druids run a dungeon, you would quickly run out of character cards because it is near impossible to anticipate demand.

The truth is the system is not seriously flawed. The big complaints are more about personality conflicts between players and with DMs.

8000 tickets with probably 4000 individual people interacting with over a hundred volunteers.

A feed back card in the epilogue room is a must not only to address problems but so that good people can get better by responding to comments.

We are already doing what we can by adding to the forums.

Every year the experience gets different and better. There are 18 different rooms. Some will have better writing and execution then others.

I do fully agree with Ed, True Dungeon could definitely harness the power of the auto-generated ticket buying email more.

Thank you for purchasing a ticket for True Dungeon. It is HIGHLY recommended you check out truedungeon.com for information and potential connection with the rest of your dungeon party. *words words words*