TOPIC: Counterfeit Token Concerns

balthasar wrote: I would prefer URs stay gold so they don't stand out when looking at ten packs of tokens.

As others have mentioned, this would be easily beaten by using an opaque plastic covering rather than translucent for the 10 packs.

Forar wrote:

balthasar wrote: I would prefer URs stay gold so they don't stand out when looking at ten packs of tokens.

As others have mentioned, this would be easily beaten by using an opaque plastic covering rather than translucent for the 10 packs.

I'm not completely opposed to opaque wrapping but I do like being able to see the rare token in each pack for a variety of reasons.

Instead of putting RFID chips in the tokens We should just put RFID chips in all True Dungeon players and call it a day.

Kirk Bauer wrote:

Forar wrote:

balthasar wrote: I would prefer URs stay gold so they don't stand out when looking at ten packs of tokens.

As others have mentioned, this would be easily beaten by using an opaque plastic covering rather than translucent for the 10 packs.

I'm not completely opposed to opaque wrapping but I do like being able to see the rare token in each pack for a variety of reasons.

While I normally agree with you, being able the rare on unopened packs has always bothered me.

My first year playing (2012) I was completely hooked and bought about 30 packs of the 2011 set on eBay (I know better now). I was wondering then if the seller picked which packs to sell based on the rare. I was also afraid the packs had been opened (some were already broken from being poorly packed), and there was no chance of an UR. However, there was a Libram of Looting in one, so I was happy.