TOPIC: How to react on the internet

• One must always view and react to something in the worst light possible.
• One mustn't let one's inner rage monster starve.
• Never, ever give someone the benefit of the doubt.
• The Principle of Charity is not a thing.

Could we here on this forum, maybe, possibly, do better?

Druegar wrote:

• One must always view and react to something in the worst light possible.
• One mustn't let one's inner rage monster starve.
• Never, ever give someone the benefit of the doubt.
• The Principle of Charity is not a thing.

This image is hidden for guests.
Please log in or register to see it.

Could we here on this forum, maybe, possibly, do better?

I would agree with you but Wapner was better

Completely hear you - definitely important for the community to be civil (even when their choice of TV judge is inherently flawed and morally bankrupt

Fred

Fred K wrote: their choice of TV judge is inherently flawed and morally bankrupt

I was not making an assertion of moral superiority.

I don't care who you think is a better person, Judy's eyeroll game is light-years ahead of Wapner.

Apologies to folks for my particular contributions to that dumpster fire. I felt that my ethics and other folks that I know pretty well were being called out unfairly and reacted strongly (and poorly) to that.

Druegar wrote:

• One must always view and react to something in the worst light possible.
• One mustn't let one's inner rage monster starve.
• Never, ever give someone the benefit of the doubt.
• The Principle of Charity is not a thing.

Could we here on this forum, maybe, possibly, do better?

I’ll add this link also: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

EDIT- Not to refute anything Druegar said, but for when arguments happen on the internet in general.